vivek-chimman26

vivek-chimman26 has not published an app.

• LetzGo.LIVE, 2 Nov 2026: *What confused me* - The website headline, "The Operating System for Real-World Experiences", sounds impressive but doesn't really tell me what the product does. The homepage also throws around 40 features at me, including OCR, secret chats, a Master Key and a vendor marketplace, before explaining who the product is actually for. The TestMyBuild description, "Run small-group events, manage payments, chat and expenses", is much clearer and gives me a better idea of what I'm signing up for. - I had just created a new account, but the "Coming up" section was already showing events belonging to other people, such as "5-Day Azores Trip", "russia backpacking" and "5-Day tarkarli this will be a Itinerary". At first, I assumed these were my events. Some also looked like test data, which made the experience feel a little unfinished. - When I tried adding an expense, the first question was "Who is this expense with?". The Add button stayed disabled until I selected people, a group or an event. There was no option to record an expense just for myself. That's confusing because the listing specifically mentions personal expense tracking. - The event creation form felt unnecessarily complicated for something as simple as planning a day outing. It asks for things like summits, route points, base camp, fitness level, equipment and a map. For a straightforward Nandi Hills trip, most of these fields aren't relevant. It feels like the form is designed primarily around treks rather than everyday group events. *What I would change* - Make the homepage hero more concrete. Something like a trek with an ₹18,000 tempo traveller split between 6 friends would immediately show people what the product is good at. It's much easier to understand than a broad headline about an operating system. - Don't show other people's events in a new user's "Coming up" section without context. Either keep it empty until the user creates their own events or clearly label these as "Public events near you". - Allow users to add personal expenses without selecting a group or event. Also, simplify the event creation form by showing only the basic fields initially, with a "More options" section for trek-specific details. *What I liked* - The AI assistant was easily my favourite part. I typed "Plan a weekend trek to Nandi Hills for 5 friends from Bangalore", and it automatically filled in the event details, including the name, type (trek), location, date for this weekend, 2-day duration and currency in rupees. That's a genuinely useful starting point and saved me quite a bit of manual work. - The product feels built with India in mind. INR is the default currency, the examples are relevant to Indian users, and features like DigiLocker verification make sense for this market. Even the greeting used the correct local time. - I also liked the dashboard. It's clean and doesn't overwhelm me, with clear next steps like planning an event, splitting expenses and starting a group chat. I could quickly understand what I was supposed to do next. Overall, there's a useful product here, especially for organising group trips and managing shared expenses. The AI event creation is a strong starting point. I'd focus on making the first-time experience simpler and explaining the core value before introducing all the advanced features.
• Daylift, 2 Nov 2026: *What confused me* - On a wide desktop screen, the Meal plan grid looked almost completely blank. I tried clicking an empty dinner slot, but nothing happened, and there was no obvious way to add a meal. When I made the window narrower, I noticed that a "+ Add" option appeared when hovering over each slot. The page says "Pick a slot below", so I expected the slots to look clickable regardless of screen size. - When I opened the add-meal box, the heading said "What's for breakfast?". Even after changing the Meal selection to Dinner, the heading stayed the same. It's a small thing, but it made me wonder whether the meal selection had actually changed. - The app greeted me with "Good morning, Vivek" at around 2 PM in India. It seems to be using server time rather than my local time. Greetings should reflect the user's actual time zone. - On the shopping list, rice, tomatoes and dal all ended up under "Everything else", while milk was correctly categorised under Dairy. I'd expect common ingredients like these to have their own sensible categories. *What I would change* - Make the "+ Add" option visible in every empty meal slot instead of showing it only on hover. This would make the feature much easier to discover, especially on desktop. - Use the user's local time zone for greetings and anything referring to "today". It feels strange when the app tells me it's morning in the middle of my afternoon. - I'd also rethink the TestMyBuild listing description, "Just the random everyday hands". It doesn't really explain what makes the product useful. The website headline, "Stop keeping the house in your head", communicates the value much better and would make a stronger first impression. *What I liked* - The 5-step Getting started card is a really nice way to introduce the app. I could understand what to do without needing a tutorial. One click added a weekly chore, and after ticking it off, the app correctly showed "Next due Nov 9". Adding milk to the shopping list was just as easy. - The meal planning and shopping list integration is probably my favourite feature. I could add ingredients to a meal and then simply tap "Add ingredients to shopping list". Everything was added without having to enter the items again manually. That's exactly the kind of small convenience that makes a household app useful. - Overall, the app feels calm, simple and quick to use. There's no unnecessary clutter, no annoying pop-ups, and I wasn't constantly being pushed towards a paid plan. I could just get on with trying the features, which made for a really pleasant experience.
• Phosify, 2 Nov 2026: *What I built* I typed a single sentence: "AI intake assistant that qualifies prospects before discovery calls, for consultants and agencies in India." In about 40 seconds, I had a complete 5-section website, with live progress showing what was being built. I also liked that the hero image picked up on the India part of my description, so it felt somewhat tailored to the business I had in mind. *What worries me most* - The biggest issue was the testimonials. The site automatically generated three reviews under "What Our Clients Say", from Raj S., Anita G. and Karan M. I don't have any such clients, so these were completely made up. This is more than just a design issue. If someone publishes the website without checking everything, they're presenting fake customer reviews as genuine. That could seriously damage their credibility and potentially create legal issues. - It also invented a contact email (info@aiintakeassistant.com) using a domain I don't own, along with a placeholder phone number (+91 98765 43210). Despite this, the chat told me the site was "Ready to publish". Any potential leads coming through those details could simply disappear. - I think generated testimonials and contact information should be clearly marked as placeholders. More importantly, the platform should prevent publishing until these details have either been verified, replaced with real information, or removed. *What confused me* - The "Your website is ready" email pop-up appeared over a blurred website preview. I couldn't properly see what had been generated without first giving my email address. I'd prefer to review the result before being asked for my details. - The website was named "Untitled Site", and the brand name was set to "AI Intake Assistant". I wasn't asked for an actual business name during the process. Since most people building a website will already have a business or brand name, this feels like an important step to include. *What I liked* - Being able to go from one sentence to a complete website so quickly was impressive. I also liked that I didn't have to sign up until there was actually something worth saving. That feels like the right order of things. - The editing panel was well organised. Styles, layout, logo, header, services, WhatsApp, booking and custom domain were all available in one place. It was easy to understand where to go to make changes. - The passwordless email sign-in was smooth and didn't add unnecessary friction. *Would I pay or resell?* The speed is genuinely impressive, and I can see the value for consultants, agencies and people who need to get a website up quickly. But I wouldn't pay to use this for client websites or resell it just yet. I need to know that fake testimonials and incorrect contact details can't accidentally make it onto a live website. Getting a website built in 40 seconds is great, but it needs to be safe to publish too.
• Employee Time Clock, Scheduling & Timesheets, 2 Nov 2026: *What confused me* - I clicked "Start free" and was taken straight to a dashboard with my name and "BriefIntake" already filled in. There was no sign-up screen or explanation of what had just happened. At the same time, a banner at the top said I was using Shiftora without an account and that my workspace would be deleted after a day. I genuinely wasn't sure whether I had an account or not until I clicked "Save my workspace". - The "Deleted after a day" message is one of the first things you see when entering the app. It feels more like a warning than a welcome. I'd much rather be told what I can do first. - Clicking "Clock in" on the dashboard doesn't actually clock me in. It just takes me to the Time clock page, where I have to click "Clock in" again. Since the homepage presents this as a direct action, I expected one click to be enough. - The Time clock page displays the workspace's Kiosk PIN in the corner, completely visible. This could easily become a security issue if an owner is sharing their screen or takes a screenshot. *What I would change* - Make it clear what happens after clicking "Start free". Something as simple as "We've created a trial workspace for you. Save it with one click to keep it" would remove a lot of the initial confusion. - Hide the Kiosk PIN by default and let users reveal it with a "Show PIN" button when needed. - Show pricing in the visitor's local currency, or at least make it clear upfront that CAD is the only available currency. Seeing prices in a currency that may not be relevant to me makes it harder to judge the cost. *What I liked* - The homepage explains what the product does in one simple sentence. I also liked the sample timesheet next to it. The weekly total of 31h 49m added up correctly, which was a nice touch. - The "Get your team set up, 0 of 4 done" checklist makes onboarding easy to understand. Each step has a clear action, so I always know what to do next. - Once I figured out the flow, clocking in and out was instant. It used the correct local time, and the shift appeared on my timesheet straight away. - The free plan for up to 5 people, with no card required, is already a good starting point. Getting 90 days with everything unlocked makes it even more generous and gives people enough time to properly try the product.
• Florim, 2 Nov 2026: *What broke or confused me* - I'm in India, and although the app lets me use English, quite a few things still feel built specifically for Brazil. My new account came with goals like "Carro, Casa, Viagem" (Portuguese). Some dropdowns still say "Selecione…", the expense card says "VALOR", and the income page shows "1 registro em November". It feels like the language localisation is only partially done. - Switching to rupees was easy enough (Settings → Language & currency), but the payment methods didn't change with it. PIX was still the default, and the available options were PIX, Credit, Debit, Meal Voucher and Dining Voucher. For someone in India, I'd expect to see UPI and cash instead. - The amount field took me a moment to figure out. When I typed 1500, it showed ₹15.00. I had to enter 150000 to get ₹1,500. Most people here think and enter amounts in whole rupees, not paise, so this makes it surprisingly easy to log the wrong amount. - I had just created a new account and hadn't added any data, but the Home screen already said, "Florim analyzed your last 90 days and may have found savings opportunities". How could it have analysed 90 days of spending when I hadn't even started using the app? That made me question how reliable the insights actually were. - On the Income page, "Monthly trend" showed ₹1,666.67 after I added a single ₹50,000 salary. That's ₹50,000 divided by 30, so it looks like a daily average being displayed under a monthly label. - The AI category suggestion appears above the Category field and pushes the rest of the form down. I ended up clicking in the wrong place because the layout shifted unexpectedly. *What I would change* - Make the localisation more complete. When someone selects a currency, the defaults should change accordingly. For INR, that means UPI and cash instead of PIX, and goals and labels should use the selected language. - Make the amount field work naturally for whole rupees. Typing 1500 should give me ₹1,500, not ₹15.00. Alternatively, make it very clear that the last two digits are being treated as paise. - Don't show the "Start your 30-day Pro trial" pop-up so early. It appeared immediately after I logged my very first expense. I'd rather have some time to explore the app before being asked to upgrade. *What I liked* - The AI category suggestions were actually very good. "Electricity bill" was correctly categorised as Housing / Electricity, and "Salary" was recognised as Salary. Both worked exactly as I'd expect. - The calculations were correct. Adding ₹50,000 in income and a ₹1,500 bill showed ₹48,500 remaining, with the bill correctly listed under Pending. - The website's explanation of WhatsApp expense logging was particularly good. The example "Bought sneakers for 150 in 3x" becoming 3 instalments made the feature immediately understandable. Honestly, that's one of the clearest feature explanations I've seen in a finance app. - I liked that the founders shared their story. It makes the product feel more personal, and having a free plan that doesn't require a card makes it easy to give the app a try. *One thing I couldn't test* I didn't connect WhatsApp because the phone number field defaulted to Brazil's +55 country code. I would have needed an India (+91) option before proceeding.
• Askly, 2 Nov 2026: *What confused me* - "Try it FREE" is the biggest button on the homepage, so naturally I clicked it expecting to get started. But nothing seemed to happen. No sign-up, no chat box, nothing. I eventually figured out that I had to click "Log in" to create an account. - Before signing up, it showed "2 FREE questions left". After creating an account, it still showed 2. I wasn't given any extra questions, so I wasn't really sure what the benefit of signing up was. - The TestMyBuild listing mentions "a few free Quick questions", and apparently earlier testers got 5 and 3. I only got 2. It would be much clearer if the free allowance was consistent and stated as one fixed number everywhere. - I liked that it automatically switched me to the India page with prices in rupees, but some things still seemed to be set up for South Africa. The banner said "Win R10 000", and the Competition link took me to the /za/ page. It felt like the localisation was only partially done. - I couldn't tell which AI model was answering my questions. The homepage specifically mentions Claude, Gemini, ChatGPT and DeepSeek as reasons to use Askly, so I expected to see which one was actually responding. *What I would change* - Show the AI model used for each answer, along with how much that particular response cost. Since the platform uses pay-as-you-go pricing, this is probably one of the first things I'd want to check. - The shortcuts are useful, but they insert templates containing "[add details]" that I have to manually find and replace. It would be much easier if that placeholder were highlighted or the cursor automatically landed there. - Give people at least one or two additional free questions when they sign up. Otherwise, there's not much incentive to create an account when the free allowance stays exactly the same. *What I liked* - The answers were genuinely good. I asked a GST-related question and got the correct answer, along with a GST-inclusive breakdown that I hadn't specifically asked for but found helpful. I also tried generating a meeting agenda and got a clear 30-minute plan with timings that actually added up. It handled my typos without any issues too. - The pricing model makes sense. Starting at ₹49, with no card required and a balance that never expires, feels like a fair option for people who don't want another monthly subscription. - I liked how clean the chat interface was. The shortcuts also felt practical, covering everyday tasks rather than being there just to look impressive.
• Cominty Platform Console, 2 Nov 2026: *What did I build? Did it work?* I built a "Discovery Call Prep" agent. You give it a prospect's website, and it puts together a short company summary along with 3 questions to ask during a discovery call. I described what I wanted in one sentence, and it built the agent for me using Claude Sonnet 5.5, two fallback models, and a web tool. I tested it on my own website, and the results were good. The summary was accurate, the questions were relevant, and it even showed me which pages it had read. *What impressed me* - Starting with "Describe the agent you want" is a really good approach. I didn't have to figure out the setup myself. One sentence was enough to get a working agent. - I liked how transparent everything was. It showed every step, which model was used, how long things took, token counts, and even the build cost ($0.0148). As someone who works in AI engineering, I appreciate being able to see what's happening under the hood. - It automatically configured model failovers without me having to do anything. - The €15 free credit with no card required made it easy to give the platform a proper try. - My entire test, including building the agent and running it once, used just €0.05 out of the €15. I could also see the balance updating live in the sidebar. *What was frustrating or confusing* - The build took around a minute. One "Reasoning" step took about 43 seconds, but the counter stayed at "15 steps · 9.7 sec" the whole time. I wasn't sure if it was still working or had got stuck. A live timer or even a simple "Still thinking..." message would make a difference. - Once the draft was ready, I couldn't immediately find the _Create agent_ button. It was inside the card, below the chat box fold. The only indication that I hadn't finished was the "Your agent is not created yet" message next to Continue. - I clicked _Test_ on the card, which took me out of the onboarding flow. The sidebar still showed "Get started 2/4", so I wasn't sure whether I'd skipped something or if that was expected. - The "€15 free credit" pop-up appeared just as I started typing my first test message, and the message never got sent. Not the best first experience. - Building one fairly simple agent used 229k input tokens. That's fine when it's covered by free credit, but it did make me wonder how much building agents typically costs. *How does it compare to other agent platforms?* I usually build agents by writing code, using the Anthropic SDK directly or LiveKit when I'm working on voice agents. Compared to that workflow, Cominty saves quite a bit of setup time. It handled the sandbox, web tool, and model failovers in about a minute, all from a single sentence. That's genuinely useful. The trade-off is control. I couldn't review or edit the full system prompt before creating the agent. I'd also like the ability to test changes in a more code-like workflow, where I can tweak something, run it again, and compare the results. *What's missing for my use case?* Two things would make this much more useful: - Batch processing: the ability to give the agent a list of URLs and have it process them all at once. - Integrations: an option to send the results directly to an email or a spreadsheet instead of having to copy them manually. *Would I use it for real?* Yes, definitely for small internal agents like this. The setup is quick, and I like that the costs are visible rather than hidden. For something I'd use in production, though, I'd want to spend more time testing its reliability and understanding what a typical run costs over time before depending on it. *One thing I'd fix first* Make the build progress feel alive. The frozen counter made me wonder whether the platform was doing anything. And make the _Create agent_ button impossible to miss. I shouldn't have to search for the main action after the agent is ready.
• PULSE: Know what you can spend, without doing the math, 2 Nov 2026: *What confused me* - After clicking "Build my dashboard", I had to go through four screens before I could actually use the app: the "You're set" summary, the member #32 card, the install prompt, and then a 5-step tour. When I first tapped + to add an expense, it took me to the tour instead. I just wanted to log something. - On the member card, I clicked "Open PULSE" and only got a "Welcome, Vivek" message. Nothing else happened until I clicked it a second time. - Setup asks "What are you here for?" at the beginning and then "Pick up to 3 priorities" towards the end. These felt like pretty much the same question, so I wasn't sure why I was answering them twice. - I selected Freelance, but the app never asked when I usually get paid. Instead, it automatically set my payday to 1 Dec. Since the per-day safe-to-spend amount depends on this date, it seems important to get it right. Freelancers don't necessarily have a fixed payday. - My rent was marked as "auto-debit", but I was never asked how I actually pay it. - The install screen says "Browsers can clear a website's saved data" just after telling me "Everything you add is saved to your account". That felt a little contradictory and left me wondering where my data is actually stored. *What I'd change* - Let me land on the home screen first. There are too many interruptions before I can even try the app. Ideally, keep it to one pop-up at most. - During setup, ask something like "When does money usually land in your account?" This would be especially useful for freelancers or anyone without a fixed salary date. - Make expense logging work with a simple click on laptops. Swiping with the mouse did work, but it wasn't immediately obvious that I could do that. *What I liked* - Adding an expense by typing "chai 20" worked surprisingly well. It immediately picked up ₹20, categorised it under Chai & coffee, and showed how my safe-to-spend amount would change even before I logged the expense. - I tried asking "Can I afford ₹3,000?" and got a clear "Yes". It also showed my per-day amount dropping from ₹282 to ₹178. I checked the calculation myself, and the maths was correct. - I liked that the setup summary actually explained how safe-to-spend is calculated: money in accounts, minus upcoming bills, minus a buffer. It made the number feel transparent rather than something I was just expected to trust. - Not having to connect my bank account was a big plus. Being able to use approximate numbers made it feel much more comfortable to explore the app. _Note: I used approximate test numbers throughout, not my actual financial information._
• Daily Captain, 2 Nov 2026: *What confused me* - After signing up, I landed on my profile page, not on today's goals. The biggest button there was *Publish* (make my page public). For a goals app that felt like the wrong first step. - On the goals page, *Next* took me to Buddies instead of the rest of my day. I lost track of where the midday check and night routine were. - The "Day one" screen showed a tick for "Your page at dailycaptain.app/vivekchimman", but I never published it. It made me think my page had gone public, and I had to go and check that it hadn't. - On Buddies, the text under "Invite a buddy" is hidden behind the sticky Next button. *What I would change* - The paywall came about 10 minutes in, before I'd seen the midday check or the night routine, which is what makes this app different. I'd let the first full day run free, then ask. - The paywall says the sheet goes read-only after “Not now”, so I couldn’t even tick off the goals I just wrote. That feels like losing my work. - "What a first day!" showed up in the morning, before I'd done anything. It praises writing goals, not doing them, which goes against the "close the day honestly" idea. *What I liked* - The trial terms are honest and all on one screen: price, renewal, cancel in two taps, and what "Not now" keeps. No surprises. - The "Did you know" line names its research source, so it doesn't feel like a random motivational quote. - The founder card on Buddies is a personal touch. I'd show it after a few days of use rather than on day one.