Sign in

gis-65

BuilderTester

On TestMyBuild since . 9 apps tested, 1 listing.

Listings

Apps tested

Approved posts only
  • AI Carousel Generator for Instagram & TikTok, : First impressions: The hero is strong - "Your AI carousel designer. It does all the work.", with the prompt box right in the hero. "No credit card" is visible. On first load the hero was blank dark blue for a few seconds, with only the nav showing. Scrolling into "Every slide, designed for the swipe" showed empty slide tiles, then a fully black screen for a moment. It looked broken. Lazy-load the images or show placeholders. Pricing shows yearly-upfront amounts by default, and the page never says how many credits one carousel costs. Signup: I typed a prompt in the hero and hit Enter. It took me to signup with my prompt kept in the URL. Nice. After Google signup and the "Set up your brand first?" screen (good choice: Set up my brand vs Skip for now), my prompt was gone. The box was empty. Carry it through. What I made: "A 5-slide carousel on 3 study habits for high school students". You can watch the steps live (plan → find a look → build slides → check), and it took 1:13. The result was genuinely good: a "3 Study Habits Cheat Sheet" cover, a clean paper look with a lime highlight, and useful copy. The agent explained its assumptions (Instagram, placeholder @yourhandle) and suggested next steps. Slide 3 had a big empty gap between the subtitle and the body text. Edit: "Make the headline on slide 3 bigger". It took 21s, changed only slide 3, and the agent warned me that "cram" now sat alone on the second line. That honesty is great. Credits: The first carousel cost 52 of my 300 free credits and the edit cost 7. So the free plan is about 5 carousels. Say that on the pricing page. Bottom line: This is the best result I've had from an AI carousel tool. Fix the first-load blank screens, keep the prompt through signup, and show the cost per carousel.
  • Search jobs, : Signup: "Post a job for free" with 4 free credits ("normally ฿1,280"), plus "no card, no subscription" right at the top. Very clear. Email or LINE, a 4-step progress bar (Account → Confirm email → Company → First job), and a Decline button on the cookie banner. All good. The Employer overview is clean: a "Needs your attention" item, listing counts (Published / In review / Draft / Expired), and a balance card saying "4 credits — Enough for 4 job posts of 30 days". It also picked up my company name and logo on its own. Posting a job: "Let AI write your job post" is the standout. I typed one messy sentence ("part-time cafe barista in Bangkok, Sukhumvit, weekends, basic English, 500 baht/day plus tips"). In about 8 seconds it produced a proper title, a structured description (What you will do / Who we are looking for / Work details), and filled in Category, Part-time, Weekends, Starter and No minimum education. Each field was marked "Suggested: Please check". Later it even prefilled the salary as ฿500 per day plus "Tips". Really well done. "Make the Thai version" worked in one click. But it also ticked Thai under "Languages the worker must speak", even though I'd only asked for basic English. Translating the ad shouldn't change who can apply. The Location step didn't reuse "Sukhumvit" from my sentence, so I had to search again. The search itself is great: "Phrom Phong" gave Exact and Area-only results, the map pin has a hint to place it on the entrance, and it showed "8 m from BTS Phrom Phong". On the first 3 steps it says "Draft saved on this device", then at Review it says "Draft saved — it's in Your job listings". Which is it? If the draft is in my account, say so from the start. Review and preview: The review page is clear: every field has an Edit button, there's a nudge that listings with an About text look more trustworthy, the cost is spelled out (1 credit, you have 4), and it says "Every listing is checked by our team before it goes live". "See it as a job seeker" is a great touch. A "Preview, not live" banner, the salary, Apply now, nearby stations (BTS Phrom Phong 8 m, MRT Sukhumvit 1.2 km) and job alerts. It looks like a real, trustworthy job page. I stopped at "Submit job" so I wouldn't put a fake job on your live board for real job seekers. Bottom line: This is one of the smoothest employer flows I've tried. The AI draft turns one sentence into a ready listing. Keep the "must speak" languages separate from translations, and carry the location over from the AI sentence.
  • Plum Media, : Signup "Continue with Google" on Login gave me ?error=google_account_not_found, and I had to go to Sign Up separately. If someone uses Google on Login, just create the account. Onboarding A clear 9-step layout (Brand Reader → Moodboard) with "Required fields completed 1/23". The Brand Reader is the highlight. I entered a website, and about 30 seconds later it filled 13 of 23 fields itself (company, brand, city, public email), each tagged "from your website". The "may be wrong, please review" note is honest. 👍 Step 2 (Company Basics) then asks for a primary phone, a WhatsApp approver number with OTP, a public phone, emails, a full address with pincode, and a tax number. That's a lot before I've seen a single post. The Dashboard button just sends me back to onboarding, so I can't see the product until all 23 fields are done. Instant Preview ("See 4 AI-generated posts, free, no account") asked me to sign in with Google or email again, even though I was already logged in. It should use my session. The tab title also stayed "Instant Preview" after I went back to onboarding. Pricing Lite costs ₹1,199+GST/month for 3 posts a week, and Standard costs ₹2,299. The prices are clear. Analytics is "coming soon", and the trial length isn't stated. Bottom line The Brand Reader is impressive. Show me 4 sample posts right after it reads my website, then ask for phone, WhatsApp and address.
  • Neesh AI, : First impressions The dark, techy hero looks good, but right under the headline it literally says "Error loading Earth visualization / Failed to load land map data". That's the first thing visitors read after the title. "Explore Pitches" did nothing when I clicked it. The stats contradict each other: the hero says 1,000+ founders, 23.7k spotlight views and 20.9k validated signals, but "Platform activity" lower down shows 0+ pitches, 0+ feedback and 0+ interested. The model is easy to understand: ₹84/day sprints, at least 3 Pioneers or your money back. The closing line in 11 Indian languages is a nice touch. Small grammar fix: "With Great Ideas Comes…" should be "Come". Signup Google signup was quick. The dashboard tab title still says "Create Your Free Account | Neesh AI" after login. The empty dashboard is clear: "No projects found → Create Your First Project", plus a Cross-Promotion Engine section. The blocker Create Workspace asks for startup name, one-line summary, industry and stage. That's simple and good. I filled it in (Crumb Box, cake ordering for home bakeries, E-Commerce, Idea) and clicked Start Copilot. Nothing happened. I tried twice and waited about 20 seconds: no spinner, no error message. The browser console shows why: [useProjects] Error creating project: TypeError: Failed to fetch. Fetching the profile and subscription also fails ("Backend fetch failed or blocked by CORS"). Your backend API isn't reachable from the live site, so no new user can create a project. Bottom line I couldn't get past the first step. Fix the backend/CORS issue, show an error when creating fails, and remove the map error text and the 0+ stats from the homepage.
  • iLinked, : First impressions The Creation of Adam hero with a robot hand is memorable. But the slogan text over the dark image is very low contrast, and I could barely read it. The page is very long: 7 chat "scenarios" with personas, plus big stats ("+140% CTR", "100% zero leaks", "military-grade passwords"). Without sources the numbers feel made up and hurt trust. A security product especially needs trust. Being able to shorten a link from the homepage without an account is a good idea. Inside the app The dashboard ("Cloud Command Center") is clear: Plan FREE, link/click stats, Cloud Links/Vault/Analytics/Domains tabs. Wording like "Cloud Command Center" and "Zero-Trust" everywhere is a bit much for a URL shortener. On the Shorten page, pasting a URL instantly showed "Verified Safe Target — anti-phishing scan passed". AI Suggest, the first feature on your homepage, opens an "Upgrade" modal: "AI Smart Keyword Generation (Pro Feature)". There was no lock or PRO tag on the button. Mark it, or give free users a few suggestions. I had to click "Shorten" twice: the first click only checked whether the keyword was available. The result card is nice: short link, Copy, Test, Share, QR code with PNG download, saved to the dashboard. Opening the link ilinked.online/koi-review shows a "Verified Resource" page that auto-redirects after 15 seconds. A safety page is a nice touch, but 15 seconds on every click will make people avoid using the links. Use 2–3 seconds, or skip it for verified domains. Small things The footer says "© 2026 Denyx Labs · iLinked" in one place and "© 2026 iLinked Inc., a product of Denyx Labs" in another. The upgrade modal shows INR + UPI pricing for India. Great local touch. Bottom line Solid core shortener with a real safety check. Tone down the marketing claims, label Pro features, and cut the 15-second redirect.
  • RAI Calendar, : Signup Google sign-in worked. Then a full-page "Review legal documents" screen (ToS v2.0.0 + Privacy v2.0.0) appeared before I could see anything. One checkbox on the signup screen would do the same job. The 14-day Pro trial started automatically, with no card. Onboarding tour 5 steps (welcome, connect Google Calendar, voice commands, desktop alerts, first event). Short and useful. On step 1, the first "Next" click only moved the popup to the top-left and it still said "Step 1 of 5". It took a second click to move on. Step 4 says "The web app is not meant for phones — use the native Android app when available." That's an odd thing to tell a new user. Either make it work on mobile or leave this out. Using it The New event panel is good: duration chips (30m–3h) and the timezone was auto-detected (Asia/Calcutta). I typed "@rai schedule maths revision tomorrow at 5pm for 1 hour" in the command bar. It got the date and time right (11 Nov, 17:00–18:00). The event title came out as "schedule maths revision for 1 our". The command bar dropped the letter h as I typed. The Rai chat shows my message as "…for 1 our", so a keyboard shortcut is probably firing while typing in the search box. The title also kept the word "schedule". The right-hand rail has a lot: Rai Assistant, Calendar chat, Notes, To-do, Schedule Board, Timesheet, Analytics, CRM and Toolstore. That's powerful, but the icons have no labels until you hover, and for a new user it's overwhelming. The CRM (Contacts/Pipeline/Companies, Import CSV) is clean, with a good empty state. After I saved, a "Get a reminder before this starts? Enable alerts" card popped up. Fine, but it was the third alerts prompt in 2 minutes. Bottom line The AI scheduling actually works, and the no-card Pro trial is great. Fix the swallowed "h" in the command bar, clean the command words out of event titles, and label the tool rail.
  • BriefIntake, : 4. BriefIntake — attach 04-briefintake.jpg Tested on: Web First impressions: The dark/gold look feels premium and fits consultants. "Qualify serious clients. Filter the rest." is clear. The demo video and sample brief (Priya S., 88/100, 81/100) show exactly what I get. The ₹ amounts and Diwali examples are a nice local touch. Signup The Register page has no Google button. Only the Login page does. I had to go to Login to use Google. On Register, Cloudflare's "Checking you're human…" spinner replaces the submit button for several seconds. It looks frozen. My first Google login bounced back to /login. The second try worked. Dashboard and setup The empty state is good: "No leads yet", usage 0/5, an AI disclaimer, and a 2-step explainer. "Test as a prospect" is a great idea, and the first test is free. But it only copies a link and tells you to open a private window. Add an "Open test" button. The prospect page shows a blank "You're almost there…" screen for about 8 seconds before the Talk/Chat choice appears. The intake itself : Anika's questions were relevant, and the whole chat took about 3 minutes. When I said "Budget is flexible, what do you usually charge?", Anika replied "We'll get to budget in a moment". She never came back to it. Your homepage uses this exact case to sell the product ("The follow-up a form can't ask"). She asked "what does it cost you if this isn't solved?" right after I'd answered it (20 lost cakes a month). "Before Christmas" became "end of December" in the brief. Each reply took about 5–7 seconds. The brief The lead appeared straight away with a verdict of READY and clear Why/Budget/Timeline columns. The score shows as "75 / 69" with no labels. Which is brief quality and which is intent? Budget: "Not given — said budget flexible, asked what firm charges." That's exactly the gap the follow-up should have closed. Bottom line: The concept and polish are great. Make Anika actually follow up on vague budgets before ending the chat, and label the two scores.
  • UXFix, : First impressions The headline is clear: "Reproduce bugs faster with session replay and technical evidence". The animated report flow (user reports → UXFix captures → team resolves) explains the product in about 5 seconds. The "Password fields masked" badge is a smart trust signal. Onboarding Once logged in, the nav swaps to Dashboard. Clicking it opens a new tab. So do "Get the widget snippet" and Settings. After 2 clicks I had 3 UXFix tabs open. Keep it in one tab. The empty Bug board ("No reports yet. Add the widget…") is clear, but there's nothing to look at. A sample report with a fake replay and AI summary would show me the value before I install anything. Settings shows "Finish setting up 0 of 2": choose a plan + add an allowed domain. The snippet is visible, but there are two warnings: "Activate a plan before collecting bug reports" and "Reports are rejected until you add an allowed domain." The biggest blocker The "14-day free trial" only starts by picking a paid plan (Starter $29/mo or Standard $79/mo). Until then the widget can't collect reports. So I couldn't test the replay, AI summary or widget at all, which is exactly what you asked testers to try. Start the trial automatically on signup, or give every new workspace a few free reports. Small things The landing graphic shows Jira, Linear and ClickUp. The Standard plan lists Jira, Azure DevOps and ClickUp, and no Linear. Make them match. Bottom line The product looks solid and the pitch is clear. Right now the onboarding stops at a paywall before the "wow" moment. Let people send one test bug for free.
  • Koi Launch, : First impressions The hero gets it across fast: "Build and publish apps with ChatGPT or Claude", with two clear buttons. The phone mockup with sample apps (Split the bill, Budget) shows the end result straight away. "Start free" in the header doesn't go to a signup page. It just scrolls down to the same Add to Claude / Add to ChatGPT section. I expected an account screen. The examples carousel (Chemistry quiz, 2048, Fridge chef) is only images. You already have a Community of real apps inside the product, so link to those instead. Signup The login screen is clean: Google, Telegram or email, plus "New here? Pick any option — your free account is created right away." The landing page is light and the app is dark, which feels like jumping to a different product. Inside the app Discover/Community is a nice touch: 25 apps, a "Today's Pick" (Red Flag or Green?) and categories. Many community apps are in Japanese or Uzbek, and there's no language filter. As an English user, half of "Study" and "Money & life" wasn't usable for me. Create shows "What do you want to make?" with sample cards and a prompt bar. Sending it hands you off to ChatGPT or Claude. That's the core idea, but nothing on the screen says you'll leave Koi. One line like "This opens Claude with your idea typed in" would fix it. The Install button (PWA) sits top-right with no explanation of what it installs. Bottom line The idea is strong and the login is painless. The gap is right after signup: say clearly where building happens, and make the community browsable in my language.