LuveAir (Love Air)

LuveAir (Love Air) is a 100% free dating app.

WebFree trial

Listed by jcgm1990,

it is a dating app

Bounty
?per approved post

The bounty is what this listing pays a tester per approved post. Sign in to see it.

Free trial, then a paid plan. Testers never pay to test. If a trial asks for a card, cancel before it ends.

This app is made and run by its builder, not by TestMyBuild. We tried it once before listing it, which is not a check that it is safe, keeps working or handles your data well. Use your own judgement.

Feedback

3 testers, on Web

3 posts, newest first
jan
Signup screenshot

Heads up: I'm going to be harsh and nitpicky on purpose. "Looks good" won't help you, these small details will.

I tested on my phone first, even though it's a web app, because I think that's where your audience is.

First impression
The important stuff is above the fold. "Love is in the air, join the revolution" hooks me, and the intro makes it clear right away: a dating app, but free. You're doing this 80% right.

Sharpen the "why you"
People already on Tinder and Bumble will think: "Those are free too." Yes, they only really work if you pay, but "free" alone doesn't get that across. Further down you have "Tired of pay-to-play dating?", which is the right idea. I'd use pay-to-win instead and put it at the top. Tinder and Bumble are free, but if you pay, you win. LuveAir has no pay-to-win.

Nobody reads your landing page
Most people only read what's above the fold. With AI it's cheap to add lots of explanation, but nobody reads it. The urge to "explain more" usually backfires. The premise needs to be simple enough that it doesn't need explaining.

Sign up as an overlay
"Start matching" sends me to a different page. Very common, but I want to sign up on the page I just saw. Make sign up / sign in an overlay. It matters more for conversion than you'd think, we noticed the difference on TestMyBuild.

Lose the beating heart
The pulsing logo looks cool but it's distracting. Do you want a cool heart or signups? If you want animation, animate profiles instead.

Show profiles, not faces
The people on your landing page don't look real. Look at Tinder's App Store listing: they show actual profiles inside the app, which is also what my profile will look like. Use yourself, friends, a sibling. Show profiles you can swipe on, everywhere in your marketing.

Sign up
Name and email, fine. "Sign up with Google" is great, but make the form feel more minimal.

  • The Google prompt says I'm logging into Lovable. That scares people, it looks like a different product.
  • Bug: On iPhone Safari, after Google sign up I get a loading animation in onboarding, then a blank page. Tried several times, couldn't get past it. On my laptop it works, so I continued there.

Onboarding
Date of birth with the native picker, fine. Then eye color, body type, hair color, hair length, ethnicity. Optional and quick, but for every step ask: is this necessary? Can't you see my eye color in my photos? Every second in onboarding is a chance to lose someone.

Photos
This took way too long:

  • Couldn't select multiple images at once on my computer at first.
  • No zoom or crop, on Chrome or iPhone. Basic editing would let me just screenshot my Instagram and crop it.
  • The primary photo is always the first upload and I can't change it without re-uploading everything. Let people pick.

Wild idea: import photos from Instagram, or log in with Tinder/Bumble and copy the profile over. That would be amazing.

Verification
Government ID upload: maybe normal in the UK, but in most of the world, especially the US, hell no. I'd never upload my ID to something like this. If you need it, use a trusted third party. This is your biggest risk right now.
The selfie is fine, but make it very clear no human will ever see it. And use it to confirm the person's face is in one of their profile photos.

Matching
I signed up as a straight man and the first profile I saw was a man: you, the founder. Then more guys. Showing nothing would be better. Probably test data for now.

The real challenge
Directly: you need to get women in. That's the core of any dating app. Even as it is today, if you get enough women on it and show them on the landing page, you're most of the way there.

Overall
I like the idea a lot because it's simple: a dating app with no pay-to-win. Tinder and Bumble have become really complicated. I just want to start and see who's there, and that's a real advantage. Fix the mobile sign up bug, rethink ID verification, and you've got a pretty good app on your hands.

from the team
s
san
Signup screenshot

Signed up with my email and the verification mail landed in under a minute, the link worked straight away, so that part was genuinely smooth. First onboarding step was fine too — bio, birthday, the usual dropdowns, all quick. Then it stopped dead at step 2. It wants at least 3 photos and there is no skip and no way around it, the Continue button just tells you there aren't enough photos. I get that a dating app needs photos, but as a new user I wanted to look around first before handing over pictures of myself, and the app gives you no chance to do that. I never got to see a single profile or find out how matching works. One more thing: the first time the homepage loaded, every bit of text showed up as raw keys like homepage.hero.title for a good few seconds before the real words appeared. Rough first impression. Let people browse first, or at least make the first photo optional — the signup itself is actually decent, it's the photo wall that kills it.

approved+1
g
genzmeet
Signup screenshot

Overall Impression: The app has significant friction during onboarding and needs improvements in user trust, personalization, and the discovery experience.
Issue: The onboarding process asks for too much information upfront, which can lead to users dropping off before exploring the app.

  • Requires a minimum of 3 photos.
  • Asks for details like eye color and hair color during initial registration.
  • Too many steps before users can experience the actual product.

Suggestion: Keep onboarding short and simple. Ask only for essential information initially, and allow users to complete their profiles later.
Issue: The app appears to accept any type of photo during onboarding, without proper validation.

Suggestion: Implement photo validation to ensure users upload appropriate, genuine profile pictures. Provide clear photo guidelines and meaningful error messages.
Issue: The app asks users to upload government ID proof directly during onboarding, before they have built trust in the platform.

This creates several concerns:

  • Users may feel uncomfortable sharing sensitive identity documents with an unfamiliar platform.
  • Users have no idea whether there are enough active profiles in their location.
  • After spending time uploading photos, filling in details, and providing ID proof, users might discover that there are very few relevant profiles available.
  • This can create disappointment and lead to users abandoning the app.

Suggestion:

  • Build user trust before requesting sensitive documents.
  • Clearly explain why ID verification is necessary, how documents are stored, and how user data is protected.
  • Consider allowing users to explore a limited version of the app before completing verification, where safety requirements permit.
  • Communicate profile availability or community size before asking users to invest significant effort.

Issue: After logging in as a male user, the app displayed male profiles without clearly establishing my gender preferences.

Suggestion: Ask users whom they are interested in during onboarding and use that preference to personalize the discovery feed. Avoid making assumptions based only on the user's gender.
Issue: I couldn't find an obvious option to change gender or discovery preferences after completing onboarding.

Suggestion:

  • Make discovery preferences easy to find in Settings or Filters.
  • Allow users to update their preferences anytime.
  • Provide clear filtering options for gender, age range, location, and distance.

The biggest issue is that the app asks for significant commitment before demonstrating its value to users.

Recommended improvements:

  1. Reduce onboarding steps and make non-essential fields optional.
  2. Allow profile completion progressively after registration.
  3. Improve photo validation and profile authenticity checks.
  4. Reconsider the timing of government ID verification while maintaining safety standards.
  5. Clearly explain privacy and verification policies.
  6. Improve discovery personalization and preference management.
  7. Help users understand whether relevant profiles are available before requesting sensitive information.

The app needs to focus more on building trust and delivering value before asking users for extensive personal information.

A smoother onboarding journey, transparent verification process, and better discovery preferences could significantly improve activation, user satisfaction, and retention.

approved+1